Today we had a very interesting meeting with another Genesis group and our course convener Stewart.
Both groups shared their top three failures and top three successes. The purpose of this exercise was to reveal how each group experienced more or less similar themes, despite having different personalities and different products.
The common theme we identified was of the challenge in holding people accountable to their roles and tasks, and avoidance towards getting into conflict. Stewart asked us, "what advice would you give to future Genesis groups?" and someone replied, "choose your groups very, very carefully".
We then got into a discussion about the benefits of perhaps being given predetermined groups, more time, varying numbers... the list went on. But Stewart insisted that in the past they have tried many iterations and yet this exact challenge keeps on reoccurring. Why might that be?
We tried to come up with theories as to why this might be, but nothing really felt satisfying, for me at least. Then as I was driving home a theory came to me that echoes a lot of the internal dialogue I've been having over the last few weeks. This dialogue related to a question: Surely if I was a true entrepreneur, I wouldn't be in a program learning about entrepreneurship? I'd be out there, entrepreneuring!
So here's the theory that came to me...
At the beginning of the year, the people in this course can be grouped into two categories:
- People who are interested in entrepreneurship, but have never started a business - perhaps due to fear of failure
- People who are looking for direction in life and hear good things about this program or thought it would be a solid platform to find direction
0 comments:
Post a Comment